I decided to take a look at the area of the city of Chita, known for being highly contaminated with uranium with a life expectancy said to be just above 40 years for its inhabitants, following the recent war drums against Russia. I looked around and eventually found an area that has the features of an uranium death camp, with corridors (trenches) and piles of sand that correspond with a practice observed in another camp in Belarus, where bodies are stored under sand to foil supplementary contamination.

The principle of an uranium death camp (a subject largely covered, under the toponym of retchlag (rezkoie fizitcheskoye istochtchenie, camp of death through forced exhaustion in work), on this website – non exhaustive list) relies on forced quarrying with just a pick at most in corridors in soils of high natural radioactivity, with the inhalation of the dust causing death in a few months at most. No one can survive this regime. The USSR was covered with these camps, first shown methodically by Avraham Shifrin. In Ukraine a few ones were found under Volodymir Zelenski’s presidency, and one dismantled by the Russian operation as it was near the border. The bodies are always re-used as fuel as well, to exploit the internal contamination, usually in sodium for the indispensable breeding.

So this time it is in Russia’s Far East that I found the corridors of an uranium death camp.

It seems that there is some “humor” of the regime in choosing the “murs qui gazent” district for its death camp. Among warning signs, a less fluent output of videos from the war front, Russian Telegram channels were covered by videos of battle events during the first year but this has receded, and the reduction of transparency is a sign that less clean weapons, made from crematory or mash materials (the level of plutogenization in these being always lower than in clean weapons for biophysical reasons), are used. Satellite data also suggested (the DUex map in particulate mode on Earth.nullschool.net) that there is a degree of contamination of Russian war lines that at least comes from abandonment of the cleaning with magnets that they did largely at the beginning of the war but may also come from the kinetic return of dust (“Fermionic channeling” as I’ve dubbed it) from nonclean weapons.

I got some videos of Lancet strikes that confirm to me the use of crematory material by the Russian MoD. They don’t flash at impact but create a thick black cloud that doesn’t rise much. One commentor wondered whether the tanks targeted were really destroyed as it was said.

So, these are excellent indicators that something has changed in Russia and that crematory material is being used in these new weapons.

Let’s look again at the body storage system in the camp, under piles of sand. Akin to what is visible in this case in Belarus.

Recent removal is visible in one case. These piles are each for a victim. They are located in the middle of the first set of corridors.

I wondered if there is an agreement with China for plutogenization in a chimney-style system which would be consistent with the type of the explosion of the missiles. The “crematory-sodium” combination was also tested in Iran and import of the method is likely. It differs from the usual Soviet system where bodies are not cremated but cut in pieces mixed in sodium. This allows to rank the Russian regime as “nazi” and not “Soviet”, a choice also consistent with the theme of the language minorities that pervades Russian diplomacy and was also Adolf Hitler’s main theme in foreign affairs. My question on China comes from the fact that China not only does crematory weapons (Maoism has chosen to adopt many of the characteristics of Nazism for their common root ideology is agrarianism), but that there is a chimney emitting lots of particulates near the Russian border on Chinese territory not so far from the area of the death camp. China already proposed weapons to the Russian Federation earlier (crematory tanks firing straffing rounds, extremely polluting). There may be an offshoring agreement because Russia stopped crematory weapons several years ago and clearly doesn’t have the necessary facilities unlike China.

Update 13/08 :

I observed for long data on crematory strikes and it’s clear this has been a short episode. Russians told me the camp is (was) for people negating the dangerosity of DU weapons. It’s very credible and logical. Russian forces have used crematory weapons from that camp for a short period. Ukrainians have on the contrary resorted again to it recently. It’s a clear case for instance that they have been used to fake a fire of “tyres” in Zaporrizhia NPP. Plumes from tyres keep their bubbly shape from the tyres’ shape, as in the general law of shape conservation in plumes. It’s also not the good plume colour, and the fact is that the fire of tyres should have left fumes outside the chimney’s tube. No : it was impacted by a crematory-tipped drone. The fire wouldn’t have that colour, it’s a radioactive fire (not related to plant fuel as said the IAEA).

There is more : see here, here and here.